Feb 07
Is Blogging Taking Over Traditional News Source?
Feb 06
Blogging vs. Traditional News
Now more than ever, blogs are a source to which many people turn when they are in search of specific information or trusted opinions on a given topic. Personally, I rely heavily on food blogs, as I’ve found that the recipes posted there are more adaptable to the diet and income of everyday people than, say, those one might find on the website of a five-star gourmet chef. A growing concern as blogs increased in popularity was that they would radically transform the way in which people received their news, but I don’t think this is likely to happen. In Tony Rogers’ article “Can Bloggers Replace Journalists”, he argues that journalism and blogging are vastly different media animals, and I wholeheartedly agree. I am the Lifestyle Section Editor of The Meridian Student Newspaper at Lehman, and so I work on and with articles on a monthly basis, preparing them to go to print. I have also worked as a blogger for Obscura Literary and Arts Magazine. As a journalist, my job was to report the news; I researched facts and statistics, and conducted interviews to lend support to my findings. Blogging, however, was more closely tied to my own personal experiences, rather than someone else’s.
In the article, Tony Rogers addresses this contrast between blogging and traditional news, stating, “Expressing one’s opinion is very different from doing objective news reporting. And while opinions are fine, blogs that do little more than editorializing won’t satisfy the public hunger for objective, factual information.” He argues that blogging can be a useful tool to document important events, and therefore act as a supplement to news reporting, but cannot sufficiently replace that form of media. Citizen journalism, which is news collection and analysis by the public, can be performed successfully through blogging platforms like WordPress and Tumblr. An example of this might be during activist movements. Blogs can track the progress of a movement and report on both public and media response to it, as was the case at the height of the Black Lives Matter movement.
Feb 06
Blogging vs. Traditional News
Blogging is a great way to express personal interests and opinions, and I do believe they have the power to take over traditional news sources. In Tony Rogers’s article “Why Bloggers Can’t Replace the Work of Professional Journalists”, he explains that both outlets produce different content. He brings up a valid argument that bloggers are simply commenting on news stories already out there. Roberts also explains that bloggers “vent their opinions” while news outlets report facts. This statement can be somewhat controversial considering many news outlets like CNN and Fox News can be said to state their own options and show bias to certain political agendas. Which bring up Benjamin Carlson’s article “The Rise of the Professional Blogger”. Carlson explains that blogging has lowered the Barries to self-publication, and has evolved into a more traditional form of news reporting. Many of these self-made bloggers have even gone to work for networks such as CBS, ABC, and NBC.
It’s also important to note that Twitter and microblogging, should not be considered a form of reliable news. As the Ubiquity paper explains, Twitter is a quick and easy way to put opinions and ideas out into the world. However, what went into creating these tweets, and should we really be relying so heavily on social media to get news? I think it’s all about balance and doing your own research. People are way too quick to believe everything they see online, after all, do we use Twitter as a source to cite scholarly papers?
I firmly believe that you do not need a degree to do what you’re passionate about and if that’s news reporting then all the power to you. As mentioned before, many news outlets cannot even be seen as reliable, as they all propose some sort of propaganda. Journalism is all about telling a story from ALL sides and reporting FACTS. But let’s all keep in mind it’s important for each of us to do some of that digging ourselves if we really want to find out the truth, then judge for ourselves.
Feb 06
Blogs vs. Traditional News
In this day and age a believe it is possible for blogs to take over traditional news sources. I don’t think it will be possible that blogs will take over all news sources that we know but I do believe it will take over the majority. In this generation, most millennials and generation z’s receive most if not all their news from the internet. We depend more on what we interact with on the daily. With the use of our phones and computer, we are most likely to get our news from what’s in front of our faces and what can appear anytime on our screens. In “Why Bloggers Can’t Replace the Work of Professional Journalists” Rogers states that instead of becoming better than a professional reporter, bloggers can gear towards citizen journalism to write their stories. Most bloggers don’t come up with news stories on their own instead, they comment on what already public made by the professionals. This makes a big point as to why professional reports cant be replaced, their work is so unique that it would be hard to receive that from anyone thats not a professional. In “The Rise of the Professional Blogger” Michael Massing mentions the pros of blogs. He states that unlike old media, blogging allows people of all ages to contribute to this change in media. Many others such as Glenn Reynolds and Clay Shirky agree with Massing that the old media mainly attracts the older audience while blogging aims at the young few. I personally don’t believe that bloggers will take over the jobs of journalist due to the fact that people may gear towards factual news instead of something anyone could have written online. The news will always be the first thing many people will look into when it comes into getting information may it be on politics, the weather, or information on what’s happening in your community. In “Why We Twitter: Understanding Microblogging Usage and Communities” the professionals mention something I have never heard of before, Microblogging. Microblogging is a form of communication that allows its users to post statuses about what they’re doing at that exact moment of their lives. In platforms such as, Facebook and Twitter or even text messages it gives its users the chance to communicate to their friends or family and update them on what going on. This shows the changes in how we received information in the past and how it has changed today
Feb 05
Microblogging VS Traditional News By Jaritza Flores-Garcia
A blog is a discussion or informational website published on the World Wide Web consisting of discrete, often informal diary-style text entries. Posts are typically displayed in reverse chronological order, so that the most recent post appears first, at the top of the web page. Microblogging is an online broadcast medium that exists as a specific form of blogging. A microblog differs from a traditional blog in that its content is typically smaller in both actual and aggregated file size. Users used it to create blogs from sites such as WordPress, Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, and many others. They also use blogs to create stories from current events that happen in the world today. Back in the day, journalism became a tool when newspaper companies were built to give readers the scoop about what is happening in their community and in the city, but, then, both the radio and television were invented to make shows about local, national, and global news to keep viewers updated with stories. In this case, blogging cannot replace journalism because according to ThoughtCo.com’s article entitled “Why Bloggers Can’t Replace The Work Of Professional Journalists?”, Tony Rogers stated that bloggers don’t produce their own stories, instead, they used comments to voice their own opinion about the early days of blogging. Blogging made an impact on the Internet, providing updates to and information on users about events, thoughts, and memories through blogging sites. In fact, according to The Atlantic’s article entitled, “The Rise Of The Professional Blogger”, Benjamin Carlson quoted that blogging has lowered the barriers to self-publication by average citizens, the free-wheeling fraternal spirit of blogging has become increasingly subject to market disciplines. Blogging also created sites like Twitter, which had been founded since 2006, thus making more bloggers to share information with others because according to a study by students from the University of Maryland, as of April 2007, Twitter has about 94,000 users within eight months of its launch and updates were made to describe one’s current status within a limit of 140 characters. Blogging became one of the most important tools on the Internet due to updates that were given to and shared with users so that they would know what is happening in the world today and it’s very important for them to keep in touch with the news posted on sites during their time on the World Wide Web.
Feb 04
How does Social Media Effect Us?
Man, oh man…Social media has its moments where it can be the most powerful and useful tool in the palm of your hand or the most sneakily threatening aspect to your life. From social media placing ads on your phone after you’ve made a quick Google search on that product you looked at to allowing these apps to track our every moment to allow for you to have an interactive feature to display where you are. There are people how don’t use these platforms to merely connect with anymore, it’s usually always something greater. Social media was once a positive thing to have when it was first introduced to us on smartphones but now it appears that social media is doing more harm than good. I personally feel as if social media is making people more afraid to be within each other’s personal space to have a formal conversation. Apps such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Snapchat are all used for more reconnecting with old friends and entertainment purposes there are many moments on these same platforms where individuals are bullied. People often feel less of themselves, begin digging into their insecurities to point where they make an entirely false identity to fit in, some lose their minds and some even commit suicide. That’s not at all either, Facebook is seen as an issue in politics as well. In the article “ Who Will Take Responsibility for Facebook? “, it says that Facebook admins took money from Russia intelligence to place their ads in particular positions within the website. These ads were used to ignite the flames of those in America who deal with racism, classism, views on the LGBTQ community and those who are choosing their side within the gun debate. This is an issue because if the people who are creating these platforms for us to express ourselves and so easily swayed. They managed to be persuaded by the Russian government during the 2016 election to help assist Donald Trump claim presidency over Hilary. The same tool that was created to interconnect people from all different cultures from all around the world is now the reason we’re being marginalized and manipulated. I love social media, but it’s doing more harm than good and that’s not even social media’s fault…it’s humans. But that’s another conversation for another time.
Feb 01
Social Media and Society
Social media is addicting. With countless platforms out there, it’s almost impossible to get away from all of them. Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, and Twitter (let’s just list these for now) all have something in common: they bring people together. However, although they help to connect people this doesn’t mean that each of the relationships we make are empathetic and meaningful- and a lot of the times, these apps are used for entertainment purposes. In the article, The Truth About Facebook’s Fake Quest to Connect the World written by Noam Cohen, he makes the point that Mark Zuckerberg knows “‘Humans have the capacity to maintain empathetic relationships with about 150 people…'” and Zuckerberg claims that “Facebook extends that”. I don’t believe that’s true. I think social media lessens the quality we have with people because we aren’t making an effort to see many of them in person and build “in-person” relationships with them- everything’s on a screen. Instead of even calling, we’re texting more or sending memes or doing whatever it is that people do instead of talking out loud and having a meaningful conversation. I have many friends, but I don’t have the capacity to have meaningful relationships with all- just a few. The claim that Facebook can extend the belief of having more than 150 empathetic friends is bogus. What does empathetic and meaningful even mean to everyone? Everyone has a different understanding of these words when it comes to describing friendships they have built with people. Social media, at least to me, is more for just connecting with people and entertainment- but as for getting the same quality relationship with someone from a bright lit screen? I don’t think so.
Feb 01
How has social media effected us as a society? Is this positive or negative?
Social media has affected us in society in both positive and negative ways.Individuals share their end of the week, their sustenance, their garments and whatever else from the most imperative to the most irrelevant things.It has turned into a piece of our generation lives. Having individuals on their telephones throughout the day isn’t just frustrating, yet in addition harming. Rather than conversing with somebody eye to eye and hanging out, individuals lean toward simply messaging or going on an interpersonal organization. For a few people understanding an existence without online networking is unbearable. Utilizing internet based life can have some negative impacts, for example, depression/anxiety, cyberbullying, it can bargain education, and it could affect social skills. Web based life outlets like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram allow individuals to remain associated.Online networking promoting that can achieve an a huge number of potential customers. Online life is an extraordinary instrument for making mindfulness about any social reason. Managers can connect with potential occupation searchers. It can help numerous a people to have social development and association with the world without having any problem. Numerous individuals utilize web based life to make themselves heard to the higher specialists.
Jan 31
Social media = Toxic
I believe that social media, overall is having a negative impact on society. While social media is useful for growing small businesses, connecting with friends and family, and even for school, it can also be seen as a detriment to society as whole. The power of social media is sometimes undermined, seeing that the election is proof that what goes online can change or even reaffirm ideas. In the Wired article by Virginia Heffernan, she explains that a Trump representative gives credit to Facebook for the Republican candidate’s victory. In a similar article written by Noam Cohen, Facebook claims to help expand its users relationship capacity to more than just 150 people . This marketing ploy is just that, a way for a company to attract more users with sketchy claims. I personally do have more than 150 friend on Facebook, and can say while I do know each one, I definitely do not have a personal empathetic relationship with all 200 friends. While these social media platforms allow me to interact with my friends and serve as a great way to learn about different brands and companies, I learned to rely on it much less than I used to. Social media can slowly turn into a toxic addiction. With the endless scrolling, obsessions over other peoples lives, and constant comparisons of ourselves and others, it can really start lowering our own self esteem. I personally found myself stuck in this endless circle of comparing myself to others on social media, and took a break from it this past summer. I can honestly say that was the best time of my life, where I knew absolutely nothing about others lives, or even the news around me. I didn’t miss out on anything, and felt like my happiest self. That’s when I learned social media has done much more harm than good for me. The same can be said for kids as well, seeing that some of them have social media accounts at 7 or 8 years old . All in all social media is not what it used to be, and has turned into a numbers game, leading others to think that having more likes and followers will fulfill them in some way, when that is definitely not the case.
Jan 31
Jacqueline Minelli: How has Social Media Affected Us as a Society
Overall, based on the reading I believe social media has negatively impacted our society. Companies like Facebook started out as a new exciting way to connect with other people. I don’t think it was ever intended to do harm to our society. As time went on, I feel like most of these social media sites goal was not to improve but just to seek the attention of as many people as they possibly could get. In doing this, they increased the number of people on their platforms. Then more people will join and they could receive more money from advertisements. Social media has become a way for people to get news quickly and easily. This is a positive effect but mostly negative because people are believing in fake news they see and false information users are posting. I feel like social media can be a dangerous thing because sites like Facebook are not regulated. They have billions of users and has a large influence on people and elections. Recently Facebook has had a scandal which is discussed in the article, “Who Will take Responsibility for Facebook?” by Virginia Hefferman. Mark Zuckerberg was approached about the issue of “fake news” influencing the race. He did not take the issue seriously and referred to it as “crazy”. I find this very surprising that sites like Facebook that has such a large influence on people would not have taken care of the issue in a more responsible matter. The article states, “Facebook is the internet of huge numbers of people. Voters in other words.” This is having a negative effect on society because the company admitted to receiving payment for ads placed by organizations. Some of these from groups who have racist believes and agendas. Even a member from the Trump campaign said, “Without Facebook we wouldn’t have won.” In the article, “Taking the You Out of YouTube?” by Henry Jenkins mentions how larger companies like Google are purchasing different social media’s and corrupting them. This idea is also explored in the article “The Truth About Facebook’s Fake Quest to Connect the World” by Noam Cohen. The article discusses how Facebook is deteriorating furthermore. It seems like they are not taking real action to amend what they did but just avoided the issue. This is evident in a by statement by Facebook executive Andrew Bosworth, “that’s why all the work we do in growth is justified.” This statement shows they don’t take issues seriously and their main goal is growth by an means. This is why I believe sites like these should be regulated because they could have dangerous effects on society.